Leibniz And Spinoza As Applied To Baseball :: essays research papers

Essay 2First we will canvas the assigned baseb all scenario under Leibnizs system of metaphysics. In the baseball scenario, the aggregate of the player, bat, pitch, jolt and all the other substances in the universe argon one and all contingent. There atomic number 18 other accomplishable things, to be sure nevertheless there ar also other possible universes that could ask existed precisely did not. The totality of contingent things, the bat, the player, etc., themselves do not exempt themselves. Here Leibniz involves the principle of case there can be effectuate no fact that is full-strength or existent, or any true proposition, without there being a sufficient reason for its being so and not otherwise. There must be, Leibniz insists, something outside the totality of contingent things (baseball games) which explains them, something which is itself unavoidable and therefore requires no explanation other than itself. This forms Leibnizs proof for the public of beau id eal a version of Aquinass cosmological arguments. deity, then, is the requisite being which constitutes the explanation of contingent being, why the universe is this way preferably than any other. non only is God the explanation of the baseball scenario and he is also the source of the intelligibility of such concepts as bat, swing and pitch. Leibniz goes make headway to prove the omniscience of God. If God is the explanation of the intelligibility of the universe, then God must have access to that intelligibility, such that God could be said to know what it is that being allowed to exist---that is, God must have the ability to grasp complete concepts. Not only does God constitute the contingent baseball game but he also knows what will take place before it happens. The pitch, swing and hit all take place not because God creates them but because he allows them. There is only one constraint on what God allows to happen, it must not violate Leibnizs other basic principle---non-co ntradiction. God could not allow it to happen that the batter hit the ball and the hummock got a strike. God chooses the universe that is most perfect, therefore the hitter smash the ball out of he park was the most perfect of all possibilities.Leibniz uses the word Monad to mean that which is one, has no parts and is therefore indivisible. These are the fundamental existing things. A monad contains within itself all the predicates that are true of the subject of which it is the concept, and these predicates are related by sufficient reason into a vast single network of explanation.